author

Author: Don Obrien

Supreme Court dismisses Sebi’s appeal in PNB Housing Finance case




The on Wednesday dismissed as infructuous the appeal filed by capital regulator against the Securities Appellate Tribunal’s order in a matter related to the Ltd’s Rs 4,000 crore equity capital raise plan.


A bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao was informed by the counsel for the Ltd that it has decided not to proceed with the issue and moved an application before the appellate tribunal to withdraw the appeal.





“Counsel for the respondent submits that an application has been moved before the appellate tribunal to withdraw the appeal. In view of the subsequent developments, where the respondent does not want to pursue the matter, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous,” the bench also comprising Justice B R Gavai said.


A two-member bench of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) on August 9 gave a split verdict, saying there was a difference of opinion between the members of the bench.


The SAT directed that its interim order of June 21, 2021 will continue till further orders, restraining from disclosing the voting results by the shareholders on the fund raise plan.


The voting was part of a special resolution to seek shareholders’ approval for the Rs 4,000 crore equity raise plan of PNB Housing by allotting preference shares and warrants to a handful of investors led by US-based private equity player Carlyle Group.


On May 31, the housing finance company promoted by state-owned lender Punjab National Bank (PNB) had announced the capital raise plan.


However, it soon hit a roadblock after a proxy advisory firm red flagged the preference issue, contending it was not in the interest of the promoter and the minority shareholders of the company.


Soon after, intervened and asked the company not to go ahead with the plan until a valuation of its shares is done by an independent registered valuer.


PNB Housing Finance had fixed the preference issue price at Rs 390 apiece, much lower than the stock price prevailing at that time.


However, the company defended the decision, saying it followed regulations while fixing the issue price.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor





Source link

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Oliver Bolt

Oliver Bolt

On Key

Related Posts